FOR ALL THESE REASONS, THE FOUNDERS UNDERSTOOD THAT A TRUE COOPERATIVE, WELL ORGANIZED, EFFICIENT AND DEMOCRATIC, COULD FULFILL THEIR NEEDS AND ASPIRATIONS.
In the beginning, a set of general values was defined, a sort of institutional work frame. Some of these values were related to the work done by the Cooperative, while others referred to the Cooperative’s organization, both indoors and towards the environment in which it operates. When it came to the work done by the Associates, the importance of commitment and responsibility was strongly stressed.
# Projects to be undertaken with absolute responsibility, by strict meeting of deadlines, quality in the work done, and the building of long term trust based relations with the clients.
# Be recognized by the seriousness and quality of the work done.
# Predominance of a deep analysis of the technologies and methodologies, in detriment of the imposed trends in the sector.
# Each member of the Cooperative actively participating in the collective construction of a work team.
# All members of the Cooperative must perceive a monthly income that allows them to have a worthy life, and relate to the organization and the work being done.
# Achieve a fair distribution of the earnings inside the Cooperative, based on the work each Associate provides, avoiding the disproportions observed in the rest of the organizations in the market.
# Each member of the organization must participate in the important decisions regarding the Cooperative’s management: 1 associate = 1 vote.
# All the information related to the Cooperative must be of public access and available to all Associates.
# Tecso must develop and implement the necessary mechanisms to articulate the connections with the region (Universities, ONGs, etc.).
# Tecso must participate in the Open Source Software community. This must be done by using open source software, as well as getting involved in open source software development.
|2003||F. VAZQUEZ + L. LAJE + F. LUNA|
|2004||F. VAZQUEZ + L. LAJE + F. LUNA|
|2005||F. VAZQUEZ + G. GIRÓ + L. LAJE|
|2006||F. VAZQUEZ + G. GIRÓ + L. LAJE|
|2007||F. VAZQUEZ + G. SANSÓ + G. BARRAGUIRRE|
|2008||F. REPOND + G. GOLDEMBERG + G. BARRAGUIRRE|
|2009||F. REPOND + C. BECCARIA + G. BARRAGUIRRE|
|2010||G. GIRÓ + F. VÁZQUEZ + M. BRAMBILLA|
|2011||G. GIRÓ + F. VÁZQUEZ + F. REPOND|
|2012||G. GIRÓ + F. VÁZQUEZ + F. REPOND|
|2013||G. GIRÓ + F. VÁZQUEZ + A. SPINELLI|
|2014||I. BENITES + G. BARRAGUIRRE + I. SANSEOVICH|
|2015||I. BENITES + H. FULUGONIO + I. SANSEOVICH|
|2016||I. BENITES + H. FULUGONIO + I. SANSEOVICH|
|2003||$300.000||4 ASSOCIATES||+1 CLIENT|
|2004||$500.000||10 ASSOCIATES||+1 CLIENT|
|2005||$811.000||22 ASSOCIATES||+1 CLIENT|
|2006||$1.748.000||27 ASSOCIATES||+5 CLIENTS|
|2007||$2.237.000||28 ASSOCIATES||+0 CLIENTS|
|2008||$3.600.000||43 ASSOCIATES||+7 CLIENTS|
|2009||$6.500.000||64 ASSOCIATES||+8 CLIENTS|
|2010||$10.500.000||82 ASSOCIATES||+10 CLIENTS|
|2011||$16.279.000||103 ASSOCIATES||+17 CLIENTS|
|2012||$26.978.000||130 ASSOCIATES||+11 CLIENTS|
|2013||$37.087.000||129 ASSOCIATES||+16 CLIENTS|
|2014||$53.900.000||147 ASSOCIATES||+4 CLIENTS|
|2015||$72.100.000||155 ASSOCIATES||+6 CLIENTS|